# AFI Architecture Mizan is an **Application Framework Interface (AFI)** — the server-client unification layer. ## Package layout Tree organized by role. ``` backends/ server protocol adapters mizan-django/ Django adapter mizan-ts/ TypeScript adapter (proves the protocol is language-agnostic) frontends/ client kernel + per-framework adapters mizan-base/ framework-agnostic kernel; owns data, status, error; adapters subscribe mizan-react/ React contexts + hooks over the kernel mizan-vue/ Vue composables over the kernel mizan-svelte/ Svelte stores/runes over the kernel cores/ shared language-level primitives (mizan-python forthcoming) workers/ runtime workers / bridges mizan-ssr/ Bun subprocess used by the Django template backend ``` ## Two orthogonal products - **RPC** — typed client generation via codegen - **SSR** — server rendering via the Bun bridge Independent and composable. Either ships standalone; together they compose. ## Kernel model The client kernel (`mizan-base`) is the one hard thing. Per- framework adapters are thin idiomatic wrappers around it. Codegen emits typed bindings against the framework adapter's surface, not against the raw kernel — so a React developer gets `useEcho()` and ``, a Vue developer gets `useEcho()` composables, a Svelte developer gets readable stores. Same kernel underneath. ## Schema is load-bearing The backend exports a JSON schema describing every `@client`-decorated function and context (`x-mizan-functions`, `x-mizan-contexts`). The schema IS the contract: codegen reads it, the edge manifest derives from it, MWT auth gates against it. ## Launch surface Python (Django) + React. Vue and Svelte ship as v1 alongside React. TypeScript backend (`mizan-ts`) proves the protocol is portable. ## Why the AFI shape Quadratic ecosystem growth (N server adapters × M client adapters) collapses to linear (one adapter per stack) when both sides communicate through a shared protocol. ## Invariants - All cross-package communication goes through the protocol. No direct cross-package dependencies. - New adapters land as new packages, not as modifications to existing ones. - Framework adapters wrap the kernel in framework idioms — they don't bypass it. Codegen targets the adapter, not the raw kernel.