Files
mizan/backends/mizan-fastapi/src/mizan_fastapi/forms/schemas.py
Ryth Azhur 6c5f6f1fba AFI parity: close all 35 gaps — every adapter wires every AFI-common capability
The conformance board (tests/afi/test_capability_parity.py) is now fully green:
90 capability cells + 4 meta-locks + 3 codegen byte-parity = 97 passed. The
gaps the prose table used to launder as "Django-only" / "out of scope" are
wired, against the pinned-spec model (single-authored spec, byte-identical
conformance across languages) — never per-language reimplementation.

FastAPI — edge_manifest + PSR (logic single-sourced in mizan_core.manifest),
WebSocket RPC (/ws/ through the shared dispatch), SSR (the framework-agnostic
SSRBridge relocated to mizan_core.ssr; Django rides it from there), Shapes
(SQLAlchemy projection, same declaration surface as django-readers), Forms
(Pydantic schema/validate/submit).

Rust (Axum + Tauri + cores/mizan-rust) — X-Mizan-Invalidate header, auth=
enforcement, origin HMAC cache, edge manifest + PSR, WebSocket handler / IPC
subscription channel, multipart upload, SSR bridge, Shapes, Forms; JWT/MWT
mint+verify and cache-key derivation byte-pinned to the Python reference
(cache_keys_pin, token_pin, invalidate_header_pin).

TypeScript — a KDL IR emitter byte-identical to the Python build_ir (so a TS
backend can feed the codegen — the largest gap), multipart upload, session-init,
WebSocket transport, SSR bridge, JWT/MWT mint (pinned to Python), Shapes, Forms.

Verified in the merged tree: core 25, fastapi 74, django 353/21-skip,
mizan-rust (incl. cross-language pins) green, axum 10, tauri 8, mizan-ts 103/2-skip.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 13:44:35 -04:00

78 lines
1.7 KiB
Python

"""
Form role output schemas — the wire shapes the schema/validate/submit roles emit.
These mirror the Django adapter's `mizan.forms.schemas` field-for-field (FormMeta,
FieldSchema, FormSchema, FormValidation, FormSubmitPass/Fail) so the generated
client is identical regardless of which backend authored the form. The only
difference is the source: Django builds these from `forms.Field` introspection;
this builds them from Pydantic `FieldInfo`.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import Any, Optional
from pydantic import BaseModel
class FormMeta(BaseModel):
"""Frontend behavior flags (parity with the Django adapter)."""
refetch_schema_on_validate: bool = False
live_validation: bool = True
live_form_errors: bool = False
class FieldChoice(BaseModel):
value: str
label: str
class FieldError(BaseModel):
message: str
code: Optional[str] = None
class FieldErrorList(BaseModel):
field: str
errors: list[FieldError]
class FieldSchema(BaseModel):
name: str
label: str
type: str
widget: str
required: bool
disabled: bool
help_text: str
initial: Any = None
max_length: Optional[int] = None
min_length: Optional[int] = None
choices: Optional[list[FieldChoice]] = None
class FormSchema(BaseModel):
"""Schema returned by the `.schema` role: form metadata + field definitions."""
name: str
title: str
subtitle: Optional[str] = None
submit_label: str
fields: list[FieldSchema]
meta: FormMeta = FormMeta()
class FormValidation(BaseModel):
errors: list[FieldErrorList]
class FormSubmitPass(BaseModel):
success: bool
data: Optional[dict] = None
class FormSubmitFail(BaseModel):
success: bool
errors: FormValidation