The fe39fcb commit captured the file moves (git mv stages those automatically)
but didn't catch the content edits I made afterward — npm package rename
(@mizan/runtime → @mizan/base), path updates in Makefile/Dockerfile/examples,
and doc updates were all left unstaged at commit time.
This commit lands those:
- npm rename: 3 frontend package.jsons (base/vue/svelte) + mizan-base/src/index.ts + 4 codegen templates
- path updates: Makefile, Dockerfile.test, two Gitea workflows, four example/harness configs
- doc updates: CLAUDE.md, ROADMAP.md, ISSUES.md, docs/AFI_ARCHITECTURE.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
67 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
67 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# AFI Architecture
|
||
|
||
Mizan is an **Application Framework Interface (AFI)** — the
|
||
server-client unification layer.
|
||
|
||
## Package layout
|
||
|
||
Tree organized by role.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
backends/ server protocol adapters
|
||
mizan-django/ Django adapter
|
||
mizan-ts/ TypeScript adapter (proves the protocol is language-agnostic)
|
||
frontends/ client kernel + per-framework adapters
|
||
mizan-base/ framework-agnostic kernel; owns data, status, error; adapters subscribe
|
||
mizan-react/ React contexts + hooks over the kernel
|
||
mizan-vue/ Vue composables over the kernel
|
||
mizan-svelte/ Svelte stores/runes over the kernel
|
||
cores/ shared language-level primitives (mizan-python forthcoming)
|
||
workers/ runtime workers / bridges
|
||
mizan-ssr/ Bun subprocess used by the Django template backend
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Two orthogonal products
|
||
|
||
- **RPC** — typed client generation via codegen
|
||
- **SSR** — server rendering via the Bun bridge
|
||
|
||
Independent and composable. Either ships standalone; together they
|
||
compose.
|
||
|
||
## Kernel model
|
||
|
||
The client kernel (`mizan-base`) is the one hard thing. Per-
|
||
framework adapters are thin idiomatic wrappers around it. Codegen
|
||
emits typed bindings against the framework adapter's surface, not
|
||
against the raw kernel — so a React developer gets `useEcho()` and
|
||
`<MizanContext>`, a Vue developer gets `useEcho()` composables, a
|
||
Svelte developer gets readable stores. Same kernel underneath.
|
||
|
||
## Schema is load-bearing
|
||
|
||
The backend exports a JSON schema describing every `@client`-decorated
|
||
function and context (`x-mizan-functions`, `x-mizan-contexts`). The
|
||
schema IS the contract: codegen reads it, the edge manifest derives
|
||
from it, MWT auth gates against it.
|
||
|
||
## Launch surface
|
||
|
||
Python (Django) + React. Vue and Svelte ship as v1 alongside React.
|
||
TypeScript backend (`mizan-ts`) proves the protocol is portable.
|
||
|
||
## Why the AFI shape
|
||
|
||
Quadratic ecosystem growth (N server adapters × M client adapters)
|
||
collapses to linear (one adapter per stack) when both sides
|
||
communicate through a shared protocol.
|
||
|
||
## Invariants
|
||
|
||
- All cross-package communication goes through the protocol. No
|
||
direct cross-package dependencies.
|
||
- New adapters land as new packages, not as modifications to existing
|
||
ones.
|
||
- Framework adapters wrap the kernel in framework idioms — they
|
||
don't bypass it. Codegen targets the adapter, not the raw kernel.
|